On the one hand it seems to make sense Biblically: "I have become all things to all people, that by all means I might save some. I do it all for the sake of the gospel, that I may share with them in its blessings" (1 Cor. 9:22-23). It also makes sense logically: If we cannot relate to those around us, how do we expect to have a voice to speak into their lives?
However, here are some elements we should keep in mind:
- What's relevant in one community is not relevant in another. Think of ministering in rural Michigan vs. inner city Detroit...
- How easy is it to compromise on elements of the gospel as we seek to be relevant? Granted, a lot of church don't compromise, but many have and continue to do so.
- The gospel - more specifically being the 'good news' to others - is ALWAYS relevant. Let's focus on being the gospel in the flesh rather than figuring out how to make the message fit.
- The idea of relevancy only entrenches the consumerist mentality within the church. That is, "We need to meet the needs of everyone."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5602c/5602c716610ba7a118918e07ada835280e1210bd" alt=""
I'm sure there are other points to make, but these are just intended to start the conversation...we need to strike a balance between the issues of being relevant, being real, being loving and seeking Christ in every aspect of life.
No comments:
Post a Comment